Blog

Category: Reviews

Reviews

Walrus Audio Julia: Pedal Review

An Inspiring Chorus and Vibrato Pedal for Bass Disclaimer: This pedal was kindly provided by Walrus Audio for the purpose of this review. However, this does not influence our opinions or the content of our reviews. We strive to provide honest, unbiased, and accurate assessments to ensure that our readers receive truthful and helpful information.   Chorus and vibrato pedals can be a mixed bag for bass players. Many sound fantastic on guitar but quickly become unusable once low frequencies enter the picture, either thinning out the fundamental, smearing note definition, or creating a wash of modulation that gets lost in a band mix. My interest in vibrato on bass goes back years. As a huge fan of bassist Juan Alderete, I was exposed early on to the creative possibilities of vibrato effects, particularly when paired with fretless bass. There’s something about subtle pitch movement on a fretless that can add an almost vocal quality to a bass line, transforming a simple phrase into something far more expressive. Since then, I’ve always had a soft spot for pedals that explore that territory. That’s what immediately caught my attention about the Walrus Audio Julia. On paper, it offers two of my favorite modulation effects in a single enclosure: chorus and vibrato. Having two sounds for the price of one is always appealing, but what really intrigued me was the ability to blend seamlessly between them rather than treating them as separate modes. For bass players looking to add movement, texture, and atmosphere without sacrificing musicality, that flexibility makes Julia a particularly interesting proposition. Check the price on Amazon –> Overview At its core, the Julia is an analog chorus and vibrato pedal built around a bucket brigade delay (BBD) circuit. Rather than locking players into a single chorus voice, Julia allows continuous blending between dry and modulated signals through its D-C-V control. This control is the heart of the pedal. Fully counterclockwise, the signal remains dry. As the knob moves clockwise, increasing amounts of modulation are introduced, progressing from subtle chorus to fully wet vibrato. For bass players, this flexibility is especially useful. Traditional chorus pedals often provide a fixed blend that can overwhelm the low end, but Julia allows the effect to be dialed in with precision. Design and Aesthetics Let’s be honest: most effects pedals are designed with function as the primary objective and aesthetics as an afterthought. There’s nothing wrong with that, but it often results in pedalboards filled with little more than colored metal boxes distinguished only by their logos and knob layouts. The Julia takes a different approach. Like many of Walrus Audio’s pedals, the Julia features distinctive artwork that gives it a personality of its own. The illustration has become almost as recognizable as the pedal’s sound, helping it stand out in an increasingly crowded effects market. More importantly, the design isn’t just decorative—it makes the pedal instantly identifiable on a busy pedalboard or stage. Even from a distance, it’s difficult to mistake a Julia for anything else. While visual design won’t make a pedal sound better, there’s something to be said for gear that inspires you every time you look down at your board. The Julia manages to combine practical usability with a unique artistic identity, adding a touch of character to a pedalboard without feeling gimmicky. In a world where many pedals blend together visually, the Julia stands out for all the right reasons. Controls and Features D-C-V Blend Control The D-C-V control is what separates Julia from many other modulation pedals. Instead of forcing players to choose between chorus and vibrato, it offers a continuous spectrum between the two. For bassists, this means you can dial in just enough modulation to add movement while preserving note definition and low-end presence. Subtle settings create width and dimension, while more aggressive settings move into lush chorus territory before eventually reaching pure vibrato. Rate and Depth The Rate and Depth controls shape the character of the modulation. Lower Rate settings create slow, spacious movement that complements sustained notes and melodic playing. Increasing the Rate introduces more obvious modulation that can range from classic chorus textures to experimental sounds. The Depth control determines how dramatic the pitch movement becomes. Low settings provide a gentle shimmer, while higher settings produce deep, swirling modulation capable of transforming the character of your bass entirely. Lag Control One of Julia’s most unique features is the Lag control. Rather than functioning as a traditional tone control, Lag alters the shape and feel of the modulation waveform. Lower settings provide smoother and more rounded movement, while higher settings create a more pronounced and textured modulation response. For bass players, this control becomes a powerful tool for tailoring the pedal to different instruments, playing styles, and musical situations. Waveform Selector Another subtle but useful feature is the two-position Wave switch, which lets you choose between sine and triangle LFO waveforms. While it may seem like a minor addition, changing the waveform noticeably alters the feel of the modulation. The triangle wave produces a more defined and articulate modulation, making it particularly well suited to chorus sounds. On bass, it helps create a lush, animated texture while maintaining note separation, making it a great choice for players looking to add width without losing clarity. Switching to the sine wave smooths out the modulation considerably. The rounder waveform creates a more fluid and natural pitch movement that complements vibrato especially well. On fretless bass, this can produce an expressive, almost vocal quality that feels organic rather than exaggerated. It’s the kind of control that’s easy to overlook, but after spending time with the pedal it becomes clear how useful it is. Instead of simply making the effect faster or deeper, the Wave switch changes the character of the modulation itself. Combined with the D-C-V, Rate, Depth, and Lag controls, it gives Julia an impressive amount of flexibility, allowing bass players to fine-tune not just how much modulation they hear, but how that modulation feels under

Reviews

IK Multimedia TONEX ONE+: Pedal Review

The Tiny Bass Rig Finally Grows Up Disclaimer: This pedal was kindly provided by IK Multimedia for the purpose of this review. However, this does not influence our opinions or the content of our reviews. We strive to provide honest, unbiased, and accurate assessments to ensure that our readers receive truthful and helpful information.  When IK Multimedia released the original TONEX ONE, it immediately caught the attention of bass players looking for a compact direct rig with realistic amp feel. The concept was simple but compelling: take the company’s increasingly popular TONEX amp capture technology and shrink it into a pedal small enough to fit on virtually any board. The original TONEX ONE already sounded impressive on bass. The real limitations were workflow, connectivity, and usability. Editing presets on the fly could feel cumbersome, deeper control required a computer, and integrating the pedal into modern live rigs sometimes felt more complicated than it should have been. That’s where the new TONEX ONE+ changes the story. The ONE+ is not a radical reinvention of the platform. Instead, it feels like the version the original pedal always wanted to become. With Bluetooth connectivity, mobile editing, expanded MIDI implementation, wireless preset management, and tighter integration into modern pedalboard ecosystems, the TONEX ONE+ transforms from a clever mini amp solution into something much closer to a fully practical professional bass rig. Most importantly, it does this without changing the thing that mattered most in the first place: the tones. Check the Price on Amazon –> A Bass Platform That Finally Feels Complete One reason the TONEX ecosystem translates unusually well to bass is that bass players typically approach rigs differently from guitarists. Most bass players are not switching between enormous effect chains or radically different sounds during a performance. In real-world situations, a strong clean tone, a slightly driven sound, and perhaps one more aggressive preset will cover the majority of gigs. That philosophy aligns perfectly with the TONEX approach. The ONE+ works best when treated less like a traditional multi-effects unit and more like a compact programmable bass amp. In practice, it feels equally comfortable as the centerpiece of an ampless live setup, a direct recording solution, or a lightweight travel rig for rehearsals and fly dates. The pedal’s size still feels slightly ridiculous the first time you hold it. It occupies barely more room than a standard overdrive pedal, yet it can realistically replace an amp head, cabinet simulation, DI box, and recording interface in a single enclosure. For bass players working in silent-stage environments, direct-to-FOH setups, or compact pedalboard configurations, that practicality becomes immediately appealing. What makes the ONE+ especially convincing is that it no longer feels like a compromise made for portability. Earlier compact digital solutions often sounded impressive until you pushed them in a live mix, where low-end response and playing dynamics would reveal their limitations. The TONEX ONE+ avoids much of that problem. The Tones Are Still the Main Attraction The real reason bass players became interested in TONEX was always the realism of the captures. The ONE+ continues using IK Multimedia’s AI Machine Modeling technology while benefiting from the growing TONEX ecosystem of captured amps, cabinets, and bass-specific tone models. The platform now includes a much stronger bass-oriented library than the original release ever had (but not as focused as the bass edition), with captures inspired by classic Ampeg rigs, modern solid-state heads, boutique drive circuits, studio DI tones, and aggressive contemporary bass sounds. Low-end retention is excellent, which is crucial because bass players immediately notice when digital processing starts collapsing the fundamental frequencies of the instrument. Many compact processors struggle once gain, speaker simulation, or heavier coloration enters the signal chain. The lows can become weak, transient attack softens, and note definition disappears under saturation. The TONEX platform generally handles these issues remarkably well. Much of that comes from the Bass Edition developments introduced into the TONEX ecosystem, particularly the improved phase-coherent dry/wet blending designed to preserve clarity and punch even with driven tones. The result is a playing experience that retains note weight, articulation, and dynamic response in a way that feels far closer to a genuine bass amp than many players expect from something this small. There is still a polished quality inherent to capture-based systems, but the response under the fingers feels musical and natural. Clean tones remain warm and authoritative, while driven sounds retain enough articulation to stay usable in a live mix rather than dissolving into unfocused fuzz. The Workflow Finally Matches the Sound Quality Arguably the biggest improvement in the ONE+ is not sonic at all. The original TONEX ONE delivered excellent sounds but often frustrated users once they moved beyond simply loading presets. Managing captures, editing tones, and integrating the pedal into modern live rigs could feel restrictive and unnecessarily dependent on a desktop workflow. The ONE+ addresses those frustrations directly. Bluetooth connectivity and wireless mobile editing dramatically improve daily usability. Instead of relying on a laptop every time adjustments are needed, the pedal now behaves much more like a modern professional device. For bass players running compact direct rigs or MIDI-controlled pedalboards, that change matters more than any new amp model ever could. The expanded MIDI support is equally important. Modern bass rigs increasingly revolve around in-ear monitoring systems, preset-based performances, and streamlined stage setups with minimal footprint. The ONE+ integrates naturally into that environment, allowing bass players to build a highly portable but still deeply professional setup. The addition of MIDI also opens the door to external controllers such as the M-VAVE Chocolate and similar compact MIDI footswitches. This dramatically expands the pedal’s live usability, allowing bass players to switch presets, access additional sounds, and control functions remotely without ever touching the pedal itself. Given the TONEX ONE+’s tiny footprint and limited onboard controls, pairing it with an inexpensive wireless MIDI controller can transform it from a simple mini amp solution into the centerpiece of a surprisingly flexible live rig.  More importantly, the improved workflow encourages a

Reviews

Jad Freer CAPO: Pedal Review

The Modern Bass Front End If the LUCE is Jad Freer Audio’s exercise in restraint, the CAPO is the company’s statement piece. At first glance, the two products almost seem to come from different design philosophies. The LUCE focuses on refinement, taking an already good signal and elevating it through a carefully designed tube and transformer circuit. The CAPO, on the other hand, is unapologetically ambitious. It presents the player with multiple gain stages, extensive routing possibilities, studio-grade EQ controls, saturation circuits, parallel processing options, and a level of flexibility that can initially seem almost excessive. But after spending time with it, you begin to realize that the CAPO’s complexity isn’t there for the sake of complexity. Every control exists because Jad Freer is trying to solve a very specific modern problem. For decades, bass players built their sound around amplifiers. The amp was the heart of the rig. It shaped the feel, the response, the dynamics, and the way the instrument sat in a mix. A DI box was often little more than a practical necessity—a way to get a signal to the front-of-house engineer. Today’s reality is very different. Many players perform on silent stages. Others rely on in-ear monitoring systems, record directly into interfaces, or move between different backline amplifiers every night. Consistency has become more important than ever, and the center of the bass rig has gradually shifted away from the amplifier and toward the pedalboard. The CAPO feels like a product designed specifically for that world. It isn’t simply a bass preamp. It isn’t just a DI box. It isn’t merely an overdrive pedal with some extra features attached. The easiest way to understand it is as a complete bass front end—a device designed to take responsibility for everything that happens between your instrument and the rest of the audio chain. That distinction is important because it explains almost every design decision inside the pedal. More Than a Preamp One of the first misconceptions people have about the CAPO is that it’s supposed to provide a particular sound. Many bass preamps are built around exactly that idea. You buy them because they deliver a recognizable tonal character. Whether it’s a vintage tube-inspired warmth, a modern hi-fi voice, or a particular overdriven texture, the product’s identity is tied directly to its sound. The CAPO approaches the problem differently. Instead of presenting a single tonal signature, it gives the player an enormous amount of control over how the signal behaves. That may sound like a subtle distinction, but in practice it changes everything. When musicians talk about a bass feeling “alive,” “responsive,” or “amp-like,” they’re often describing the way harmonics, dynamics, and transient response interact. These qualities don’t come from EQ alone. They emerge from the way gain stages react to the signal and how different parts of the audio chain influence one another. This is where the CAPO begins to separate itself from many other preamps on the market. Internally, it behaves less like a single preamp and more like multiple gain structures working together. Rather than simply boosting or cutting frequencies, the pedal allows the player to shape the harmonic architecture of the signal itself. That sounds like something only an engineer would care about, but the effect is immediately noticeable beneath your fingers. Notes feel denser without becoming compressed. Harmonics become richer without turning into obvious distortion. The attack remains articulate, yet the instrument develops a sense of weight and authority that can be difficult to achieve with conventional EQ alone. It’s a design philosophy rooted far more in studio engineering than traditional pedal design. Understanding the Saturation Philosophy Perhaps the best way to understand the CAPO is to stop thinking about distortion and start thinking about saturation. The two concepts are related, but they aren’t the same thing. Many overdrive pedals create their character by introducing clipping. As gain increases, the signal becomes increasingly compressed and distorted. This can be effective, but it often comes at the expense of dynamic response and low-frequency clarity. The CAPO takes a more nuanced approach. Its gain stages feel closer to what happens when a great studio preamp, a recording console, or a tube amplifier begins to work harder. Harmonics emerge gradually. Compression increases naturally. The signal thickens and develops complexity, but the instrument never loses its sense of touch sensitivity. This is one of the reasons so many players describe the CAPO as feeling “amp-like.” When you dig into the strings, the pedal responds. When you back off, it cleans up naturally. The relationship between the player’s hands and the signal remains intact. That responsiveness becomes especially apparent during long playing sessions. Rather than sounding like an effect layered on top of your bass, the saturation becomes part of the instrument’s behavior. The result is a signal that feels larger, richer, and more dimensional without sounding obviously processed. The J and F Personalities A large part of the CAPO’s flexibility comes from its different saturation voices. Rather than offering a single drive character, the pedal provides distinct personalities that allow players to emphasize different aspects of their sound. The J voicing tends to feel expansive and modern. The low end extends effortlessly, the overall presentation feels broad and open, and there is a certain smoothness through the midrange that gives the bass a sense of scale. The F voicing approaches things from a different angle. Where the J side feels wide and relaxed, the F side feels focused and assertive. Midrange information moves forward, articulation becomes more pronounced, and the bass occupies space in a mix with greater authority. Neither approach is inherently better than the other. They simply emphasize different priorities. What makes the CAPO particularly compelling is that it doesn’t force players to commit exclusively to one philosophy. The interaction between these voices allows for a remarkable range of textures, from pristine studio cleanliness to harmonically rich drive tones that remain articulate and controlled. Rather than behaving like preset EQ curves, these voices

Reviews

EarthQuaker Devices Scrolls Bass Odyssey

A First Look Into EQD One Stop Solution For Bass Players An all-analog bass preamp that aims to replace an entire rig in a single pedal! EarthQuaker Devices has a long history of building unconventional, forward-thinking effects, but the Scrolls Bass Odyssey pushes into more ambitious territory than most of its previous releases. Rather than focusing on a single effect type, it presents itself as a complete bass signal hub—combining preamp tone shaping, overdrive, routing flexibility, and DI functionality in one compact unit. At its core, Scrolls is designed around a simple but demanding idea: a bassist should be able to plug into any system and immediately sound consistent, regardless of venue, backline, or recording environment. A collaboration driven by real-world touring needs The Scrolls Bass Odyssey was developed in collaboration with Japanese bassist Kentaro Nakao (Number Girl, Crypt City), whose experience performing in varied live environments helped shape the pedal’s focus on adaptability and reliability. Rather than chasing a single “signature tone,” the design emphasizes portability and consistency, making it especially attractive to touring musicians who frequently encounter unpredictable stage setups. Dual-channel design: EQ and drive working together The Scrolls is built around two fully independent but interactive sections: a comprehensive EQ/preamp stage and a flexible drive circuit. – EQ / Preamp Section The EQ side functions more like a studio-grade tone-shaping tool than a traditional pedal tone stack. It includes: This section is designed not just for enhancement, but for complete tonal reconstruction when needed—from subtle refinement to dramatic reshaping. – Drive Section The distortion side of the Scrolls is tailored specifically for bass, focusing on maintaining low-end clarity even at higher gain levels. It features: The standout feature here is the bandwidth control, which allows the drive circuit to behave differently depending on frequency focus—ranging from subtle harmonic enhancement to aggressive mid-focused distortion. Flexible routing and DI integration One of the most powerful aspects of the Scrolls Bass Odyssey is its routing architecture. It is designed to function not just as an effect, but as a central signal distribution tool. Key features include: This flexibility allows players to split clean and processed signals, integrate external pedals at different stages of the chain, or run direct-to-PA setups without additional hardware. Tone philosophy: from vintage warmth to modern aggression EarthQuaker describes the Scrolls Bass Odyssey as a tonal journey that spans multiple eras of bass sound, from classic foundational tones to modern high-gain textures. In practice, the design supports a wide range of styles, including: Rather than locking players into a single aesthetic, the pedal is built to move quickly between tonal identities, making it suitable for multi-genre performers. First impressions: more than just a pedal Early impressions suggest that the Scrolls Bass Odyssey behaves less like a traditional stompbox and more like a compact bass front-end system. Its combination of EQ flexibility, drive shaping, and routing options places it closer to rack-style preamp workflows than typical pedalboard effects. This makes it particularly relevant for: Conclusion The EarthQuaker Devices Scrolls Bass Odyssey is not a subtle addition to the bass effects world. It is designed as a central command unit for bass tone, combining multiple roles into a single, highly configurable platform. Rather than replacing one pedal category, it effectively merges several: preamp, EQ, drive, DI, and routing hub. For players looking to consolidate their setup without sacrificing control, it represents one of EarthQuaker’s most ambitious bass-focused designs to date.

Reviews

The Hartwood Satellite Bass: Bass Review

Disclaimer: This bass was kindly provided by Hartwood Guitars for the purpose of this review. However, this does not influence our opinions or the content of our reviews. We strive to provide honest, unbiased, and accurate assessments to ensure that our readers receive truthful and helpful information.  When I first heard of Hartwood, I was intrigued. Budget basses that don’t conform to the usual rules are exciting almost by default. The affordable end of the market is saturated with instruments that are essentially the same three designs copied endlessly with slightly different logos attached. So when Hartwood offered to send us the Hartwood Satellite bass for review, the answer was a pretty resounding yes. Because immediately, this thing looked different. Not “different for the sake of it,” either. The Satellite feels like somebody actually sat down and tried to design a bass with a coherent vintage-inspired identity instead of simply making yet another bargain-bin Precision clone. And honestly, that alone gives it a head start over a huge amount of the competition. Check the price of the Hartwood Satellite here! First Impressions One of the biggest wins of the Satellite is the fact that it is unapologetically original. Instead of competing directly with a thousand indistinguishable P-Bass copies, it carves out its own niche with a distinctive retro-futuristic aesthetic that feels genuinely intentional. That matters more than people sometimes realise. Budget instruments are often treated almost like commodities: same factory templates, same hardware, same layouts, same compromises. The Satellite doesn’t feel like that. It feels like someone actually cared about the visual concept and wanted it to stand apart. And then you pick it up. The Neck The roasted maple neck is the real headline feature here. Not because roasted maple itself is rare anymore, but because so many inexpensive instruments use it as little more than a marketing buzzword. Sometimes it feels like the wood has merely been shown a picture of a toaster and sent out the door. Here, though, the neck is genuinely excellent. It has that smooth, slightly dry, “already played in” feel that you normally associate with much more expensive instruments. Stability feels solid, the finish is comfortable without being sticky, and the overall impression is frankly kind of ridiculous for the money. The wheel-style truss rod adjustment at the base of the neck is another touch you simply don’t expect at this price point. It’s one of those practical quality-of-life features that instantly makes setup work easier and makes you wonder why more manufacturers don’t do it. Fretwork & Fingerboard This is another area where the Satellite punches above its class. The fretwork on this instrument is genuinely impressive for a budget bass. No sharp fret ends, no sprout, no nasty surprises anywhere along the neck. Everything feels neat, level, and properly finished. The laurel fingerboard also deserves credit. Laurel often ends up looking dull or obviously “budget,” but Hartwood has done a surprisingly good job here. It presents nicely, complements the roasted maple neck well, and contributes to the overall premium feel of the instrument. There’s also some nice attention to detail in the fret markers and finishing work that helps the whole thing feel more cohesive than you’d normally expect in this price bracket. Body & Hardware The body is basswood, which is hardly unusual at this level, but importantly it avoids that ultra-soft, “spongy” feel cheaper basswood instruments sometimes suffer from. The Satellite still feels reassuringly solid and balanced. The hardware is a mixed bag, though there are pleasant surprises. The knobs, for example, are actually really nice. They’re proper alloy knobs with grub screws instead of cheap push-on plastic affairs, and little details like that genuinely affect how an instrument feels in the hands. They also make future upgrades easier if you decide to swap electronics later down the line. Fit and finish overall are surprisingly strong. The neck pocket is tight, everything feels well aligned, and electrically the bass behaves itself very well indeed. On the amp, there were no pops, crackles, grounding issues or unexpected buzzing even while moving the bass around aggressively. Again, that’s not always guaranteed at this price. Sound The pickup configuration is interesting because although it uses a split-coil P-style pickup, it isn’t positioned exactly where a traditional Precision pickup would be. The result is a tone that’s less boomy than you might expect and noticeably more mid-focused. There’s still warmth there, but it avoids getting muddy, and it actually sits in a mix surprisingly well. Importantly, it doesn’t sound like a failed attempt at recreating a Fender Precision. It sounds like its own thing, which suits the whole philosophy of the instrument rather nicely. Even the stock strings were unexpectedly decent. Most players will probably replace them eventually out of habit more than necessity, but unlike many budget instruments, the Satellite doesn’t arrive sounding like it’s wearing recycled fencing wire. The Weak Spot If there’s one area where the budget nature of the instrument really shows, it’s the tuners. Even after restringing properly and setting witness points carefully, tuning stability still wasn’t particularly impressive. It’s not catastrophic, and fortunately replacement tuners are neither expensive nor difficult to fit, but this is definitely the weakest component on the bass. The upside is that the problem is very fixable. A modest tuner upgrade would probably transform the overall experience entirely. Modding Potential And that brings us neatly to one of the Satellite’s biggest strengths: it’s an absolutely fantastic modding platform. The important thing is that the core of the instrument is already strong. The neck is excellent, the fretwork is solid, the body construction is good, and the electronics are surprisingly competent. That means upgrades feel like enhancements rather than repairs. Swap the tuners, maybe experiment with pickups or wiring later on, and you’ve suddenly got something that could comfortably punch far above its original price category. That’s the difference between a cheap instrument and a thoughtfully designed affordable instrument. Final Thoughts The Hartwood