Blog

Category: Reviews

Joyo Avallon
Reviews

Joyo Avallon Compressor: Pedal Review

A surprisingly capable compressor for bass When I reviewed the Joyo Scylla compressor back in 2024, I had no idea that the pedal would eventually become such an important part of Bass Gear Reviews. What started as a review of a relatively inexpensive compressor turned into the most visited and best-converting article on the entire website, and it has remained there ever since. So when Joyo got in touch and offered to send me their other compressor, the Avallon, it seemed like a particularly appropriate opportunity to revisit what the company is doing in this part of the market. The Avallon is a very different pedal from the Scylla, though, and that’s worth making clear from the beginning. This isn’t a comparison between the two, and I don’t think it makes much sense to approach it as one. The Avallon has its own design, its own way of approaching compression and, most importantly, its own audience. Where the Scylla puts quite a lot of emphasis on being a flexible bass compressor with a tone control, the Avallon takes a more traditional compressor approach. You get Input, Output, Ratio, Attack and Release, together with a gain-reduction meter that gives you something the Scylla doesn’t: a visual indication of what the compressor is actually doing. That immediately makes the Avallon an interesting proposition for bass players, particularly those who want to understand their compressor rather than simply switch one on and leave it there. A different approach to compression The Avallon is part of Joyo’s R Series, and it is physically larger than many of the company’s compact pedals. The extra space isn’t being used for decoration. Most of the enclosure is taken up by the controls and the row of LEDs that make up the gain-reduction meter. It’s a fairly straightforward layout. Input and Output sit at the top, with Ratio, Attack and Release underneath. There is no dedicated threshold control, so the Input knob is an important part of how you set the amount of compression. Increase the input signal and you’re driving the compressor harder; reduce it and you’re backing away from the point where compression starts to become noticeable. That takes a little getting used to if you’re accustomed to compressors with a separate threshold control, but it makes sense once you start using the pedal. The Output control then gives you a way of bringing the overall level back into line after you’ve established how hard you want to drive the compressor. Ratio determines how much compression is applied once the signal crosses the threshold, while Attack and Release control how quickly the compressor responds and recovers. In practice, those four controls give you quite a lot of room to move between subtle dynamic control and much more obvious compression. That’s really the essence of the Avallon. It isn’t trying to disguise the fact that you’re using a compressor. It gives you the controls and lets you decide how much of it you want to hear. The gain-reduction meter is genuinely useful The feature that immediately separates the Avallon from a lot of inexpensive compressors is the gain-reduction meter. Compression can be surprisingly difficult to set by ear, especially when you’re starting out. It’s very easy to turn on a compressor, hear the resulting signal get louder or more controlled and assume that you’ve improved the sound when you’ve actually just changed the volume. Having some visual feedback makes that process considerably easier. The LEDs show the amount of gain reduction being applied as you play, so you can see when the compressor starts working and how much it is reacting to your playing. That is particularly useful when you’re adjusting Attack and Release because you can actually watch the compressor respond while listening to what those changes are doing to the bass. It’s also useful for an experienced player. With bass, particularly a five-string, there can be a substantial difference in the amount of energy produced by different notes. A low B played aggressively can behave very differently from a higher note played softly, and watching the meter while playing can give you a much better idea of how consistently the compressor is responding. Attack and Release matter more than you might think Attack and Release are the controls that will probably have the biggest effect on how natural or obvious the Avallon feels. A fast attack catches the initial transient of the note quickly. That’s useful when the objective is to control peaks and make the overall performance more even, but too much compression too early can also take some of the character out of your playing. A slower attack allows more of that initial note through before the compressor starts reducing the level. On bass, that can preserve some of the punch and articulation that makes the instrument work in a mix. Release works in the other direction, determining how quickly the compressor stops working after the signal falls back down. A fast release can make the compressor feel more active and responsive, while a slower release produces a smoother and more sustained effect. There isn’t really a correct setting here. It depends on what you’re playing and what you’re trying to achieve. That’s one of the reasons I like the Avallon’s approach. There is enough control to make those decisions yourself rather than having the pedal make all of them for you. Using the Avallon with bass A compressor can help even out fingerstyle playing, control the peaks of slap, give notes more consistency and add sustain without necessarily sounding like you’ve put an obvious effect on the instrument. The Avallon is well suited to that kind of use because you can start with a relatively conservative ratio and a modest amount of gain reduction and gradually increase things until you find the point where the dynamics are controlled without becoming flat. The Input control is important here. Because it effectively determines how hard you’re hitting the compressor, small changes can have

Joyo Scylla Compressor
Reviews

Joyo Scylla Compressor: Two Years Later

The biggest surprise in the entire year! When I reviewed the Joyo Scylla compressor in 2024, I thought I was reviewing a good, inexpensive bass compressor. I liked the pedal considerably more than I expected to, and the review reflected that. What I didn’t expect was what happened afterwards. The Scylla review eventually became the most searched and most viewed article on Bass Gear Reviews. It has also been the site’s best-converting article so far, which is something I find particularly interesting because there are considerably more expensive, more prestigious and, on paper at least, more exciting pieces of gear on the website. Two years later, the Scylla is still relevant, and people are still looking for information about it. That seemed like a good enough reason to come back to it. This isn’t intended to replace my original review, which you can still read here. That article goes into the pedal itself in much more detail. Instead, I wanted to look at what happens when you live with a piece of gear for a couple of years. Does it still get used? Have my opinions changed? Does the pedal still make sense now that there are more compressors competing for our attention? TL’DR: In the case of the Scylla, the answer to all three is yes. Two years is a useful amount of time Most gear reviews are necessarily written relatively soon after receiving a product. That’s not a criticism of the format; it’s simply how reviewing works. You have a limited amount of time with a pedal, you spend as much of that time as possible playing it, testing its controls and trying it in different situations, and eventually you have to sit down and write about what you found. The problem is that some things only become apparent after the novelty wears off. A pedal can be very impressive when it first arrives because it’s new and you’re deliberately paying attention to it. A few months later, it might have disappeared into a drawer. Something else has taken its place on the pedalboard and you have stopped thinking about it altogether. The Scylla didn’t really do that. It became one of those pedals that was simply there. I would use it without necessarily thinking about the fact that I was using it, which is actually a pretty good place for a compressor to end up. Compression isn’t normally an effect you want drawing attention to itself. When it is doing its job properly, it becomes part of the way the bass feels rather than something you are constantly listening for. That has probably been the biggest change in my opinion over the last two years. I don’t think about the Scylla as an inexpensive compressor that happens to be surprisingly good anymore. I think of it simply as a compressor that I like using. The fact that it happens to be inexpensive is still rather remarkable. The controls are still what make the Scylla interesting The Scylla gives you Input, Output, Ratio, Attack, Release and Tone, and that remains a very useful combination. The Input control is particularly important because it determines how hard you’re driving the compressor. The Output then gives you the opportunity to bring the overall level back to where you want it. Between those two controls, you can make sensible level adjustments rather than judging the pedal based on the very common perception that a louder signal somehow sounds better. Ratio determines how aggressively the compressor responds, while Attack and Release allow you to decide how quickly it reacts to your playing and how quickly it recovers afterwards. There is enough range here to move from fairly subtle dynamic control into much more obvious compression, which makes the pedal useful for considerably more than simply evening out a few inconsistent notes. Then there is the Tone control, which is one of the features I continue to appreciate, and it’s not something we expect to have on bass. Compressors are usually valued for being as transparent as they can possibly be, but in the case of the Scylla, it gives it an extra oomph that’s very effective. The Scylla doesn’t simply give you a conventional bass and treble arrangement. The Tone control changes the balance of the signal, allowing you to make the compressed sound darker or brighter. It is particularly useful when you’re trying to compensate for the way compression can change the perceived character of an instrument. That combination of controls is a large part of why the Scylla has aged well. There are no particularly exotic features here, but the things Joyo chose to include are genuinely useful. The Scylla is a very capable bass compressor There are plenty of compressors that can technically do more than the Scylla. The price range of the pedal makes that inevitable. Once you start looking at significantly more expensive compressors, you’ll find blend controls, sidechain filters, sophisticated metering, multiple compression modes and considerably more refined control over the signal. The Scylla is not competing with all of that. Its strength is that it gives you a useful amount of control over the fundamentals of compression without making the pedal prohibitively expensive. You can use it to smooth out your playing, control the peaks from a slap part, add some sustain or simply make your bass feel more consistent from note to note. And I think that is one of the reasons the pedal continues to attract attention. Compression is one of those areas where it is very easy to convince yourself that you need an expensive piece of equipment before you’ve really worked out what you want the compressor to do. The missing blend control If there is one feature I would have liked Joyo to include, it would be a blend control. Parallel compression is particularly useful on bass because it allows you to keep some of the original attack and dynamics of your playing while mixing in a heavily compressed signal

Reviews

Xotic EP Booster: Pedal Review

A Little More of Everything There are pedals you buy because you want an effect, and then there are pedals that quietly become part of your rig. The Xotic EP Booster is one of those pedals. It’s tiny, has a single knob, and doesn’t look particularly exciting on paper. There isn’t even anything specifically bass-oriented about it. Still, the EP Booster has found its way onto plenty of bass pedalboards over the years. Check the price on Amazon Now –> More than just a boost The EP Booster is based around the preamp section of the legendary Maestro EP-3 Echoplex. Players discovered a long time ago that the Echoplex’s preamp added character, fullness and harmonic content to their instruments even when they weren’t using the delay. Xotic took that idea and built it into a tiny standalone pedal. The Boost control gives you up to +20 dB of gain, but the pedal becomes much more interesting when you turn the volume down and listen to what it’s doing to the signal itself. The EP Booster has a noticeable character. It’s subtle, but there’s more weight around the notes, a little extra harmonic content and a smoother feel to the top end depending on how you configure the internal switches. The always-on approach Set the Boost control around unity gain and the EP Booster becomes a very different proposition. With the pedal engaged, the bass sounds slightly fuller and more substantial. The difference isn’t huge, and that’s part of the appeal. There’s no dramatic EQ curve or obvious saturation. The fundamental character of the instrument remains intact. Switch the pedal off after playing for a while and the difference becomes easier to appreciate. The bass can suddenly seem a little flatter and less lively. Switch it back on and the extra character returns. This is the sort of pedal that can sit at the beginning of a signal chain and simply stay there. Why it works well on bass Clean bass tones can sometimes become almost too clean. Modern bass rigs offer enormous amounts of clarity and headroom, which is fantastic, but a little analogue character can make the instrument feel more engaging. The EP Booster adds some of that character without pushing the sound into overdrive territory. I particularly like what it does with articulate playing. Fingerstyle, chords and upper-register lines retain their clarity while gaining a little more density. The effect is also subtle enough that it doesn’t interfere with the basic sound of the bass. That makes the EP Booster an easy pedal to leave switched on throughout a set. Don’t ignore the internal switches There are two DIP switches inside the pedal that alter its voicing, including the gain and high-frequency response. They’re worth experimenting with, especially on bass. Different instruments can react quite differently to the EP Booster. A warm passive bass may benefit from a little extra presence, while a bright modern instrument may sound better with a smoother setting. It’s a simple pedal, but these options give you enough room to find a setting that works with your particular bass and rig. Is it worth having on a bass pedalboard? If you want a completely transparent clean boost, there are better options. The EP Booster has its own sonic character, and that’s something you need to like. For an always-on preamp that adds a little weight, harmonic character and smoothness to a clean bass tone, though, it’s an excellent option. The simplicity is also part of its appeal. There’s very little to adjust, it takes up almost no space and it doesn’t require you to rethink your entire signal chain. Set the level, choose your internal voicing and play. After a while, you may find yourself wondering why the bass sounds slightly less satisfying whenever you switch it off. Final thoughts The Xotic EP Booster is a remarkably simple pedal that can have a surprisingly noticeable effect on a bass rig. The +20 dB of boost is useful when you need it, but the more interesting application is running the pedal around unity gain and letting the EP-3-inspired preamp character become part of your basic tone. For bass players who like clean, articulate sounds but want a little more weight and personality, the EP Booster is well worth trying. Sometimes a pedal earns its place on a board simply by making you reluctant to turn it off. The EP Booster does exactly that. Pros Cons Get your Xotic EP Booster on Amazon right now!

Reviews

Washburn Scavenger Reissue Review

The Weird Bass That Gets Everything Right Disclaimer: This bass was kindly provided by Washburn for the purpose of this review. However, this does not influence our opinions or the content of our reviews. We strive to provide honest, unbiased, and accurate assessments to ensure that our readers receive truthful and helpful information.  TL;DR If you’re looking for another modern P-style bass, this isn’t it. The Scavenger is unapologetically different. It looks like something straight out of the late ’70s, sounds remarkably close to a great Precision Bass, sustains forever, and has one of the most effective passive tone controls I’ve used in quite a while. It’s not perfect, it’s definitely on the heavy side, but it’s one of those instruments that makes you want to keep playing because every note seems to hang in the air just a little longer than expected. Product Specifications The Washburn Scavenger features a mahogany Wing Double Cutaway solid body paired with a mahogany neck and rosewood fingerboard. The neck has a 16″ radius, 22 frets, 6 mm pearloid dot inlays and a 41 mm nut width. The scale length is the standard 34″. Electronics are deliberately straightforward, with a P-style split-coil pickup controlled by a single volume and tone knob. The bass comes with a gloss body finish and satin-finished neck, and is available in Black and Ruby Red. The Scavenger comes strung with D’Addario EXL165 strings. First Impressions Some basses immediately feel familiar. The Scavenger doesn’t! Its asymmetrical “Wing” body shape is unlike almost anything else on the market today. It’s exactly the sort of instrument that divides opinion before anyone even plugs it in. Personally, I love seeing manufacturers revive designs that don’t simply imitate another Precision or Jazz Bass. The Scavenger has a personality all its own, and in a world filled with safe choices, that’s refreshing. Thankfully, it has far more going for it than just its looks. Design & Heritage The Scavenger is part of Washburn’s Wing series, a collection of instruments that helped establish the company’s distinctive approach to electric guitar and bass design in the late 1970s. The original Scavenger was very much a product of its era. Its unusual double-cutaway body, large hardware and distinctive styling were a departure from the more traditional bass designs that dominated the market at the time. Rather than trying to follow the established Precision and Jazz formulas visually, Washburn went in a very different direction. This reissue keeps that identity intact. That’s important because it would have been easy to modernize the design to the point where it lost what made the original interesting in the first place. Instead, the Scavenger looks like it belongs to another era while benefiting from the consistency and build quality expected from a modern instrument. And while the styling is firmly rooted in the late ’70s, the playing experience doesn’t feel dated. The 34″ scale, comfortable neck and straightforward P-style electronics make it immediately familiar once it’s in your hands. In that sense, the Scavenger manages to strike a nice balance between vintage character and a modern, usable instrument. Build Quality & Feel Washburn has done an excellent job with the overall construction. The first thing I noticed was the neck. Despite being brand new, the satin finish feels wonderfully broken in, almost as if you’ve been playing it for years. Your hand glides across it, making long practice sessions and fast position shifts feel very natural. The mahogany neck also feels reassuringly solid, complementing the substantial mahogany body. Comfort-wise, the unusual body shape works better than you might expect. Whether sitting or standing, the bass balances nicely and never feels awkward despite its unconventional design. The only caveat is for those who enjoy playing the bass in the “classical guitar” positioning. Those will find it difficult to balance due to the shape of the body. The other drawback I found is the weight. This isn’t a lightweight instrument. The all mahogany construction gives the bass plenty of substance, and you’ll certainly notice it after a long rehearsal or gig. Thankfully, the balance prevents it from ever feeling cumbersome. Tone – Surprisingly Familiar Looking at the Scavenger, you’ll almost immediately imagine how it sounds. The P-style split-coil pickup delivers much of the bite, punch and authority you’d associate with a great Precision Bass. The pickup position gives that away almost instantly. There’s a focused midrange that cuts really well through a mix, while still retaining plenty of low-end weight. Fingerstyle playing has definition, pick playing becomes wonderfully aggressive, and digging in rewards you with that unmistakable growl that has made the Precision Bass such a studio and stage staple for decades. It feels like Washburn took the P-Bass formula, wrapped it inside an unmistakably original design, and added its own character. Sustain That Borders on Ridiculous The biggest surprise for me wasn’t the tone. It was the sustain. I genuinely wasn’t expecting notes to ring out for as long as they do. Whether it’s the combination of the dense mahogany body, the high-mass bridge, the string-through-body construction, or a combination of all 3, the result is remarkable. Notes simply refuse to die. Sustained chords bloom beautifully, melodic passages become more expressive, and slower bass lines feel almost effortless because every note hangs in the air. It’s one of those characteristics that becomes more impressive the longer you spend with the instrument. A Tone Control You’ll Actually Use The passive tone control on the Scavenger is very usable. Even the smallest adjustments produce immediately noticeable results. Wide open, the Scavenger delivers an aggressive, bright voice with plenty of upper-mid presence that works brilliantly for rock and modern styles. Roll it back just a little and the sound becomes warmer while still retaining clarity. Turn it down further and suddenly you’re in classic Motown territory, with a thick, rounded thump that’s incredibly satisfying. Close it completely and pair it with a set of flatwound strings and you’re left with an intentionally dark, almost muffled sound

Reviews

Swiff Audio WT09B Wireless System Review

Can Swiff Audio Do It Again? Disclaimer: This wireless equipment was kindly provided by Swiff Audio for the purpose of this review. However, this does not influence our opinions or the content of our reviews. We strive to provide honest, unbiased, and accurate assessments to ensure that our readers receive truthful and helpful information.  A couple of months ago, I reviewed the Swiff Audio WT09A, a compact 2.4GHz wireless system that surprised me with how well it handled the demands of bass. The WT09A wasn’t perfect, particularly with the slight smoothing of the upper mids and the way particularly hot active basses could push its input stage, but overall it made a very convincing case for affordable wireless. Now Swiff has followed it up with the WT09B. At first glance, very little has changed. The WT09B keeps the same compact plug-and-play concept, magnetic charging case and instrument-friendly 1MΩ input impedance. The big difference is hiding in the wireless technology: while the WT09A operates on 2.4GHz, the WT09B moves to 5.8GHz and upgrades the audio transmission to 24-bit/48kHz. Swiff also claims latency below 5.5ms and a range of up to 200 feet line-of-sight. So, is the WT09B simply a WT09A on a different frequency, or is it a meaningful upgrade? Check the price on Amazon now! First Impressions If you’ve seen my WT09A review, there’s very little new to say about the physical side of things. The WT09B is still impressively small and lightweight, with the transmitter plugging directly into your bass and the receiver connecting to your amp or pedalboard. The magnetic charging case remains one of my favourite details of the Swiff system. It keeps both units together and protected instead of allowing them to disappear somewhere inside your gig bag. The whole package feels much more substantial than its price would suggest. And that’s something Swiff seems to understand well. Packaging and feel. The packaging is premium and these products don’t feel like cheap wireless gadgets. They’re designed as pieces of gear that you can actually throw into a working rig. 5.8GHz: What’s the Difference? The WT09A uses the familiar 2.4GHz wireless band, while the WT09B moves to 5.8GHz. Swiff’s reasoning is straightforward: the higher-frequency band is considerably less crowded than the 2.4GHz space, which is shared with an enormous number of Wi-Fi and Bluetooth devices. The WT09B also provides six channels with automatic pairing and can support up to four systems simultaneously. In practical terms, this is intended to make the WT09B a better choice for environments where wireless traffic is already heavy. And this is where I think the WT09B makes the most sense as an upgrade rather than simply another version of the same product. How Does It Sound? One of the things I liked about the WT09A was that it didn’t immediately scream “wireless” when used with bass. The WT09B continues that trend. The low end remains full and authoritative, and the instrument retains the dynamics and attack that made the WT09A such a pleasant surprise. The WT09B is specified for 20Hz–20kHz response and 24-bit/48kHz transmission, so there is certainly no shortage of bandwidth on paper. Compared directly with the WT09A, the biggest difference isn’t something I’d describe as a dramatic change in tone. Instead, the WT09B feels extremely clean and immediate. That’s exactly what I want from a wireless system. I don’t want a wireless sound, I want my bass sound. Playing Feel Swiff specifies latency below 5.5ms for the WT09B. That’s slightly higher than the sub-4ms figure quoted for the WT09A, which might look strange on paper. In actual use, however, latency isn’t something I found myself thinking about. Fingerstyle playing feels natural, ghost notes remain responsive, and slap doesn’t develop that disconnected sensation that can make some wireless systems unpleasant to use. Once you’re playing, the WT09B simply gets out of the way, and honestly, that’s the highest compliment I can give a wireless system. The Real Advantage For me, the biggest reason to choose the WT09B over the WT09A isn’t that it suddenly sounds dramatically better. It’s the RF environment. 2.4GHz is everywhere. Phones, Wi-Fi networks, Bluetooth devices and countless other pieces of equipment are competing for space in that spectrum. 5.8GHz doesn’t eliminate interference, but it gives the WT09B a less congested environment to work in. That becomes increasingly relevant when you’re playing in rehearsal spaces, venues or stages where you’re surrounded by wireless equipment. The ability to run up to four WT09B systems simultaneously also makes it considerably more interesting for bands than a basic single-system wireless solution. Battery Life The transmitter uses a 425mAh rechargeable battery and charges via USB-C, with the charging case keeping the system topped up between uses. Battery life isn’t going to make me abandon a good wireless system, but it’s something worth keeping an eye on if you’re using wireless for long rehearsals or multiple-set gigs. The good news is that the charging case makes keeping the system charged considerably easier. Put the units back in the case after playing and you’re ready for the next session. WT09A vs WT09B So, should you buy the WT09B if you already own the WT09A? Probably not. The WT09A is still a perfectly capable wireless system, and if you’ve already got one and it’s working reliably in your environment, there’s no reason to replace it simply because Swiff released a newer model. But if you’re buying your first Swiff wireless system, I’d choose the WT09B. The 5.8GHz transmission, 24-bit/48kHz audio, six-channel system and four-unit capability make it the more future-proof option. Final Verdict The WT09B is an interesting follow-up to the WT09A because Swiff hasn’t tried to reinvent the product. Instead, they’ve taken a compact wireless system that already worked surprisingly well for bass and addressed one of its biggest potential limitations: the increasingly crowded 2.4GHz spectrum. The result is a wireless system that remains small, simple and affordable while moving into a more interesting class of wireless technology. For bass players, that’s a